SOUTH ASIAN COOPERATION IN INDUSTRY, ENERGY, AND TECHNOLOGY
edited by ARIF A WAQIFThe concept of South Asian Regional Cooperation has gained in strength and importance ever since the idea came into being in 1981. Though considerable progress has been made to foster the idea of regional cooperation among the seven South Asian nations, most efforts have been of a preparatory nature and have taken the form of identifying each country's needs and problems. The time is now ripe for actually working towards 'greater cooperation in specific fields with a view to fostering collective self-reliance, It is in this context that this collection of original papers examines the rationale and feasibility of promoting cooperation in the inter-related sectors of industry, energy, and science and technology, which have not yet figured substantially in intergovernmental consultations. The Contributors: A Asaduzzaman/B Bowonder/KGDD Dheerasinghe/TSN Fernando/ JS Lall/M Masihuddin/IN Mukherji/M Rasgotra/Sadrel Raza/Falguni Sen/SN Sharma/Tarlok SINGH/VLVSS Subba Rao/RL Varshney/Arif A Waqif 260 pages/225 x 145 mm/Rs 180 (HB)/1987 |
SAGE Publications India Pvt. Ltd. |
Post Box 4215, New Delhi 110048 |
SOUTH ASIAN COOPERATION IN INDUSTRY, ENERGY, AND TECHNOLOGY
edited by ARIF A WAQIFThe concept of South Asian Regional Cooperation has gained in strength and importance ever since the idea came into being in 1981. Though considerable progress has been made to foster the idea of regional cooperation among the seven South Asian nations, most efforts have been of a preparatory nature and have taken the form of identifying each country's needs and problems. The time is now ripe for actually working towards 'greater cooperation in specific fields with a view to fostering collective self-reliance, It is in this context that this collection of original papers examines the rationale and feasibility of promoting cooperation in the inter-related sectors of industry, energy, and science and technology, which have not yet figured substantially in intergovernmental consultations. The Contributors: A Asaduzzaman/B Bowonder/KGDD Dheerasinghe/TSN Fernando/ JS Lall/M Masihuddin/IN Mukherji/M Rasgotra/Sadrel Raza/Falguni Sen/SN Sharma/Tarlok SINGH/VLVSS Subba Rao/RL Varshney/Arif A Waqif 260 pages/225 x 145 mm/Rs 180 (HB)/1987 |
SAGE Publications India Pvt. Ltd. |
Post Box 4215, New Delhi 110048 |
SOUTH ASIAN COOPERATION IN INDUSTRY, ENERGY, AND TECHNOLOGY
edited by ARIF A WAQIFThe concept of South Asian Regional Cooperation has gained in strength and importance ever since the idea came into being in 1981. Though considerable progress has been made to foster the idea of regional cooperation among the seven South Asian nations, most efforts have been of a preparatory nature and have taken the form of identifying each country's needs and problems. The time is now ripe for actually working towards 'greater cooperation in specific fields with a view to fostering collective self-reliance, It is in this context that this collection of original papers examines the rationale and feasibility of promoting cooperation in the inter-related sectors of industry, energy, and science and technology, which have not yet figured substantially in intergovernmental consultations. The Contributors: A Asaduzzaman/B Bowonder/KGDD Dheerasinghe/TSN Fernando/ JS Lall/M Masihuddin/IN Mukherji/M Rasgotra/Sadrel Raza/Falguni Sen/SN Sharma/Tarlok SINGH/VLVSS Subba Rao/RL Varshney/Arif A Waqif 260 pages/225 x 145 mm/Rs 180 (HB)/1987 |
SAGE Publications India Pvt. Ltd. |
Post Box 4215, New Delhi 110048 |
SOUTH ASIAN COOPERATION IN INDUSTRY, ENERGY, AND TECHNOLOGY
edited by ARIF A WAQIFThe concept of South Asian Regional Cooperation has gained in strength and importance ever since the idea came into being in 1981. Though considerable progress has been made to foster the idea of regional cooperation among the seven South Asian nations, most efforts have been of a preparatory nature and have taken the form of identifying each country's needs and problems. The time is now ripe for actually working towards 'greater cooperation in specific fields with a view to fostering collective self-reliance, It is in this context that this collection of original papers examines the rationale and feasibility of promoting cooperation in the inter-related sectors of industry, energy, and science and technology, which have not yet figured substantially in intergovernmental consultations. The Contributors: A Asaduzzaman/B Bowonder/KGDD Dheerasinghe/TSN Fernando/ JS Lall/M Masihuddin/IN Mukherji/M Rasgotra/Sadrel Raza/Falguni Sen/SN Sharma/Tarlok SINGH/VLVSS Subba Rao/RL Varshney/Arif A Waqif 260 pages/225 x 145 mm/Rs 180 (HB)/1987 |
SAGE Publications India Pvt. Ltd. |
Post Box 4215, New Delhi 110048 |
SOUTH ASIAN COOPERATION IN INDUSTRY, ENERGY, AND TECHNOLOGY
edited by ARIF A WAQIFThe concept of South Asian Regional Cooperation has gained in strength and importance ever since the idea came into being in 1981. Though considerable progress has been made to foster the idea of regional cooperation among the seven South Asian nations, most efforts have been of a preparatory nature and have taken the form of identifying each country's needs and problems. The time is now ripe for actually working towards 'greater cooperation in specific fields with a view to fostering collective self-reliance, It is in this context that this collection of original papers examines the rationale and feasibility of promoting cooperation in the inter-related sectors of industry, energy, and science and technology, which have not yet figured substantially in intergovernmental consultations. The Contributors: A Asaduzzaman/B Bowonder/KGDD Dheerasinghe/TSN Fernando/ JS Lall/M Masihuddin/IN Mukherji/M Rasgotra/Sadrel Raza/Falguni Sen/SN Sharma/Tarlok SINGH/VLVSS Subba Rao/RL Varshney/Arif A Waqif 260 pages/225 x 145 mm/Rs 180 (HB)/1987 |
SAGE Publications India Pvt. Ltd. |
Post Box 4215, New Delhi 110048 |
SOUTH ASIAN COOPERATION IN INDUSTRY, ENERGY, AND TECHNOLOGY
edited by ARIF A WAQIFThe concept of South Asian Regional Cooperation has gained in strength and importance ever since the idea came into being in 1981. Though considerable progress has been made to foster the idea of regional cooperation among the seven South Asian nations, most efforts have been of a preparatory nature and have taken the form of identifying each country's needs and problems. The time is now ripe for actually working towards 'greater cooperation in specific fields with a view to fostering collective self-reliance, It is in this context that this collection of original papers examines the rationale and feasibility of promoting cooperation in the inter-related sectors of industry, energy, and science and technology, which have not yet figured substantially in intergovernmental consultations. The Contributors: A Asaduzzaman/B Bowonder/KGDD Dheerasinghe/TSN Fernando/ JS Lall/M Masihuddin/IN Mukherji/M Rasgotra/Sadrel Raza/Falguni Sen/SN Sharma/Tarlok SINGH/VLVSS Subba Rao/RL Varshney/Arif A Waqif 260 pages/225 x 145 mm/Rs 180 (HB)/1987 |
SAGE Publications India Pvt. Ltd. |
Post Box 4215, New Delhi 110048 |
SOUTH ASIAN COOPERATION IN INDUSTRY, ENERGY, AND TECHNOLOGY
edited by ARIF A WAQIFThe concept of South Asian Regional Cooperation has gained in strength and importance ever since the idea came into being in 1981. Though considerable progress has been made to foster the idea of regional cooperation among the seven South Asian nations, most efforts have been of a preparatory nature and have taken the form of identifying each country's needs and problems. The time is now ripe for actually working towards 'greater cooperation in specific fields with a view to fostering collective self-reliance, It is in this context that this collection of original papers examines the rationale and feasibility of promoting cooperation in the inter-related sectors of industry, energy, and science and technology, which have not yet figured substantially in intergovernmental consultations. The Contributors: A Asaduzzaman/B Bowonder/KGDD Dheerasinghe/TSN Fernando/ JS Lall/M Masihuddin/IN Mukherji/M Rasgotra/Sadrel Raza/Falguni Sen/SN Sharma/Tarlok SINGH/VLVSS Subba Rao/RL Varshney/Arif A Waqif 260 pages/225 x 145 mm/Rs 180 (HB)/1987 |
SAGE Publications India Pvt. Ltd. |
Post Box 4215, New Delhi 110048 |
Commercial Vehicles Industry in India A Case History, 1928-1987 Sanjay Kathuria |
Although Hindustan Motors and Premier Automobiles were established prior to independence, the real history of the Indian automobile industry begins with the Tariff Commission Report of 1953, when firms without a phased manufacturing program were asked to withdraw from India. By 1965, there were seven firms manufacturing commercial vehicles, four of which also produced passenger cars/ jeeps. In 1981, the government approved the entry of four new firms (with Japanese collaboration) into the market for light commercial vehicles. This was followed by further liberalization in industrial policies, viz, broad-banding, exemption from the provisions of section 21 and 22 of the MRTP Act, and the announcement of minimum economic scales.
Since the very beginning, the government has placed more emphasis on commercial rather than private transport vehicles. This is evident in the successive Tariff Commission Reports as well as in the inclusion of commercial (but not private) vehicles in the list of 'Appendix I' industries in 1973. The industry has been protected via quantitative restrictions, a virtual ban on import of built-up vehicles, and high rates of duty. Given its role as a leading sector in economic development, the industry's average growth rate of 4 percent over the period 1950-85 would seem to be inadequate. The recessionary period of 1965-77 was followed by a boom in 1978-81. Since then, production has stagnated and the euphoria generated by the easing of restraints has been replaced by pessimism resulting from over-crowding and over-capacity, an unanticipated slow-down in growth of demand, an unforeseen rise in the value of the yen, and ambiguity in government policy. |
Commercial Vehicles Industry in India A Case History, 1928-1987 Sanjay Kathuria |
Although Hindustan Motors and Premier Automobiles were established prior to independence, the real history of the Indian automobile industry begins with the Tariff Commission Report of 1953, when firms without a phased manufacturing program were asked to withdraw from India. By 1965, there were seven firms manufacturing commercial vehicles, four of which also produced passenger cars/ jeeps. In 1981, the government approved the entry of four new firms (with Japanese collaboration) into the market for light commercial vehicles. This was followed by further liberalization in industrial policies, viz, broad-banding, exemption from the provisions of section 21 and 22 of the MRTP Act, and the announcement of minimum economic scales.
Since the very beginning, the government has placed more emphasis on commercial rather than private transport vehicles. This is evident in the successive Tariff Commission Reports as well as in the inclusion of commercial (but not private) vehicles in the list of 'Appendix I' industries in 1973. The industry has been protected via quantitative restrictions, a virtual ban on import of built-up vehicles, and high rates of duty. Given its role as a leading sector in economic development, the industry's average growth rate of 4 percent over the period 1950-85 would seem to be inadequate. The recessionary period of 1965-77 was followed by a boom in 1978-81. Since then, production has stagnated and the euphoria generated by the easing of restraints has been replaced by pessimism resulting from over-crowding and over-capacity, an unanticipated slow-down in growth of demand, an unforeseen rise in the value of the yen, and ambiguity in government policy. |
Commercial Vehicles Industry in India A Case History, 1928-1987 Sanjay Kathuria |
Although Hindustan Motors and Premier Automobiles were established prior to independence, the real history of the Indian automobile industry begins with the Tariff Commission Report of 1953, when firms without a phased manufacturing program were asked to withdraw from India. By 1965, there were seven firms manufacturing commercial vehicles, four of which also produced passenger cars/ jeeps. In 1981, the government approved the entry of four new firms (with Japanese collaboration) into the market for light commercial vehicles. This was followed by further liberalization in industrial policies, viz, broad-banding, exemption from the provisions of section 21 and 22 of the MRTP Act, and the announcement of minimum economic scales.
Since the very beginning, the government has placed more emphasis on commercial rather than private transport vehicles. This is evident in the successive Tariff Commission Reports as well as in the inclusion of commercial (but not private) vehicles in the list of 'Appendix I' industries in 1973. The industry has been protected via quantitative restrictions, a virtual ban on import of built-up vehicles, and high rates of duty. Given its role as a leading sector in economic development, the industry's average growth rate of 4 percent over the period 1950-85 would seem to be inadequate. The recessionary period of 1965-77 was followed by a boom in 1978-81. Since then, production has stagnated and the euphoria generated by the easing of restraints has been replaced by pessimism resulting from over-crowding and over-capacity, an unanticipated slow-down in growth of demand, an unforeseen rise in the value of the yen, and ambiguity in government policy. |
Commercial Vehicles Industry in India A Case History, 1928-1987 Sanjay Kathuria |
Although Hindustan Motors and Premier Automobiles were established prior to independence, the real history of the Indian automobile industry begins with the Tariff Commission Report of 1953, when firms without a phased manufacturing program were asked to withdraw from India. By 1965, there were seven firms manufacturing commercial vehicles, four of which also produced passenger cars/ jeeps. In 1981, the government approved the entry of four new firms (with Japanese collaboration) into the market for light commercial vehicles. This was followed by further liberalization in industrial policies, viz, broad-banding, exemption from the provisions of section 21 and 22 of the MRTP Act, and the announcement of minimum economic scales.
Since the very beginning, the government has placed more emphasis on commercial rather than private transport vehicles. This is evident in the successive Tariff Commission Reports as well as in the inclusion of commercial (but not private) vehicles in the list of 'Appendix I' industries in 1973. The industry has been protected via quantitative restrictions, a virtual ban on import of built-up vehicles, and high rates of duty. Given its role as a leading sector in economic development, the industry's average growth rate of 4 percent over the period 1950-85 would seem to be inadequate. The recessionary period of 1965-77 was followed by a boom in 1978-81. Since then, production has stagnated and the euphoria generated by the easing of restraints has been replaced by pessimism resulting from over-crowding and over-capacity, an unanticipated slow-down in growth of demand, an unforeseen rise in the value of the yen, and ambiguity in government policy. |
Commercial Vehicles Industry in India A Case History, 1928-1987 Sanjay Kathuria |
Although Hindustan Motors and Premier Automobiles were established prior to independence, the real history of the Indian automobile industry begins with the Tariff Commission Report of 1953, when firms without a phased manufacturing program were asked to withdraw from India. By 1965, there were seven firms manufacturing commercial vehicles, four of which also produced passenger cars/ jeeps. In 1981, the government approved the entry of four new firms (with Japanese collaboration) into the market for light commercial vehicles. This was followed by further liberalization in industrial policies, viz, broad-banding, exemption from the provisions of section 21 and 22 of the MRTP Act, and the announcement of minimum economic scales.
Since the very beginning, the government has placed more emphasis on commercial rather than private transport vehicles. This is evident in the successive Tariff Commission Reports as well as in the inclusion of commercial (but not private) vehicles in the list of 'Appendix I' industries in 1973. The industry has been protected via quantitative restrictions, a virtual ban on import of built-up vehicles, and high rates of duty. Given its role as a leading sector in economic development, the industry's average growth rate of 4 percent over the period 1950-85 would seem to be inadequate. The recessionary period of 1965-77 was followed by a boom in 1978-81. Since then, production has stagnated and the euphoria generated by the easing of restraints has been replaced by pessimism resulting from over-crowding and over-capacity, an unanticipated slow-down in growth of demand, an unforeseen rise in the value of the yen, and ambiguity in government policy. |
Commercial Vehicles Industry in India A Case History, 1928-1987 Sanjay Kathuria |
Although Hindustan Motors and Premier Automobiles were established prior to independence, the real history of the Indian automobile industry begins with the Tariff Commission Report of 1953, when firms without a phased manufacturing program were asked to withdraw from India. By 1965, there were seven firms manufacturing commercial vehicles, four of which also produced passenger cars/ jeeps. In 1981, the government approved the entry of four new firms (with Japanese collaboration) into the market for light commercial vehicles. This was followed by further liberalization in industrial policies, viz, broad-banding, exemption from the provisions of section 21 and 22 of the MRTP Act, and the announcement of minimum economic scales.
Since the very beginning, the government has placed more emphasis on commercial rather than private transport vehicles. This is evident in the successive Tariff Commission Reports as well as in the inclusion of commercial (but not private) vehicles in the list of 'Appendix I' industries in 1973. The industry has been protected via quantitative restrictions, a virtual ban on import of built-up vehicles, and high rates of duty. Given its role as a leading sector in economic development, the industry's average growth rate of 4 percent over the period 1950-85 would seem to be inadequate. The recessionary period of 1965-77 was followed by a boom in 1978-81. Since then, production has stagnated and the euphoria generated by the easing of restraints has been replaced by pessimism resulting from over-crowding and over-capacity, an unanticipated slow-down in growth of demand, an unforeseen rise in the value of the yen, and ambiguity in government policy. |
Commercial Vehicles Industry in India A Case History, 1928-1987 Sanjay Kathuria |
Although Hindustan Motors and Premier Automobiles were established prior to independence, the real history of the Indian automobile industry begins with the Tariff Commission Report of 1953, when firms without a phased manufacturing program were asked to withdraw from India. By 1965, there were seven firms manufacturing commercial vehicles, four of which also produced passenger cars/ jeeps. In 1981, the government approved the entry of four new firms (with Japanese collaboration) into the market for light commercial vehicles. This was followed by further liberalization in industrial policies, viz, broad-banding, exemption from the provisions of section 21 and 22 of the MRTP Act, and the announcement of minimum economic scales.
Since the very beginning, the government has placed more emphasis on commercial rather than private transport vehicles. This is evident in the successive Tariff Commission Reports as well as in the inclusion of commercial (but not private) vehicles in the list of 'Appendix I' industries in 1973. The industry has been protected via quantitative restrictions, a virtual ban on import of built-up vehicles, and high rates of duty. Given its role as a leading sector in economic development, the industry's average growth rate of 4 percent over the period 1950-85 would seem to be inadequate. The recessionary period of 1965-77 was followed by a boom in 1978-81. Since then, production has stagnated and the euphoria generated by the easing of restraints has been replaced by pessimism resulting from over-crowding and over-capacity, an unanticipated slow-down in growth of demand, an unforeseen rise in the value of the yen, and ambiguity in government policy. |
Commercial Vehicles Industry in India A Case History, 1928-1987 Sanjay Kathuria |
Although Hindustan Motors and Premier Automobiles were established prior to independence, the real history of the Indian automobile industry begins with the Tariff Commission Report of 1953, when firms without a phased manufacturing program were asked to withdraw from India. By 1965, there were seven firms manufacturing commercial vehicles, four of which also produced passenger cars/ jeeps. In 1981, the government approved the entry of four new firms (with Japanese collaboration) into the market for light commercial vehicles. This was followed by further liberalization in industrial policies, viz, broad-banding, exemption from the provisions of section 21 and 22 of the MRTP Act, and the announcement of minimum economic scales.
Since the very beginning, the government has placed more emphasis on commercial rather than private transport vehicles. This is evident in the successive Tariff Commission Reports as well as in the inclusion of commercial (but not private) vehicles in the list of 'Appendix I' industries in 1973. The industry has been protected via quantitative restrictions, a virtual ban on import of built-up vehicles, and high rates of duty. Given its role as a leading sector in economic development, the industry's average growth rate of 4 percent over the period 1950-85 would seem to be inadequate. The recessionary period of 1965-77 was followed by a boom in 1978-81. Since then, production has stagnated and the euphoria generated by the easing of restraints has been replaced by pessimism resulting from over-crowding and over-capacity, an unanticipated slow-down in growth of demand, an unforeseen rise in the value of the yen, and ambiguity in government policy. |
Using Clear Verbal Communication Activity |
1. Assign one person to perform each of the following roles in this activity. If you have more than four people, have two people act as observers.
2. Instructions for activity:
|
Admission Criteria: Admission criteria to an ELP program is as follows: Criteria 1: Students will be admitted to the ELP program based on the result of the diagnostic test if he/she is not having a valid certificate related to English Language Proficiency as mentioned in Annexure 1. The verification of the same will be done by the Division of International Affairs and Division of Admissions. Criteria 2: In case the student is having a valid certificate related to English Language Proficiency as mentioned in Annexure 1 but he/she belongs to non - English speaking countries then the student must also appear in the diagnostic test. Based on the test score following options will be there for the student:
|
Admission Criteria: Admission criteria to an ELP program is as follows: Criteria 1: Students will be admitted to the ELP program based on the result of the diagnostic test if he/she is not having a valid certificate related to English Language Proficiency as mentioned in Annexure 1. The verification of the same will be done by the Division of International Affairs and Division of Admissions. Criteria 2: In case the student is having a valid certificate related to English Language Proficiency as mentioned in Annexure 1 but he/she belongs to non - English speaking countries then the student must also appear in the diagnostic test. Based on the test score following options will be there for the student:
|
Admission Criteria: Admission criteria to an ELP program is as follows: Criteria 1: Students will be admitted to the ELP program based on the result of the diagnostic test if he/she is not having a valid certificate related to English Language Proficiency as mentioned in Annexure 1. The verification of the same will be done by the Division of International Affairs and Division of Admissions. Criteria 2: In case the student is having a valid certificate related to English Language Proficiency as mentioned in Annexure 1 but he/she belongs to non - English speaking countries then the student must also appear in the diagnostic test. Based on the test score following options will be there for the student:
|
Admission Criteria: Admission criteria to an ELP program is as follows: Criteria 1: Students will be admitted to the ELP program based on the result of the diagnostic test if he/she is not having a valid certificate related to English Language Proficiency as mentioned in Annexure 1. The verification of the same will be done by the Division of International Affairs and Division of Admissions. Criteria 2: In case the student is having a valid certificate related to English Language Proficiency as mentioned in Annexure 1 but he/she belongs to non - English speaking countries then the student must also appear in the diagnostic test. Based on the test score following options will be there for the student:
|
Admission Criteria: Admission criteria to an ELP program is as follows: Criteria 1: Students will be admitted to the ELP program based on the result of the diagnostic test if he/she is not having a valid certificate related to English Language Proficiency as mentioned in Annexure 1. The verification of the same will be done by the Division of International Affairs and Division of Admissions. Criteria 2: In case the student is having a valid certificate related to English Language Proficiency as mentioned in Annexure 1 but he/she belongs to non - English speaking countries then the student must also appear in the diagnostic test. Based on the test score following options will be there for the student:
|
History of Shoes
A Blank~28 Shoes—we wear them nearly every day. We walk, run, jump, climb, and stand in them for hours on end. Yet we hardly think about them because they are such an ordinary part of our daily lives. Shoes were not always an important part of people's wardrobes. The ancient Greeks, Egyptians, and Persians made and wore sandals, but actually went barefoot most of the time. These people lived in regions where the weather was temperate, and shoes were not needed to keep their feet warm. Archaeologists have found shoes in the ruins of these civilizations, but they seem to have been worn mainly by royalty, who could afford to employ tailors and shoemakers. B Blank~29 As shoes became more common in ancient Egypt, the first ones were simple sandals created mainly to protect the soles of the feet from rough surfaces. The easiest way to make shoes in these ancient times was to use materials that were readily available, including tree bark, leaves, and grasses. In ancient Egypt, sandals were made of rushes, which are grassy plants with hollow stalks. Rushes are the same plants used today to make chair bottoms, mats, and baskets. Among the ancient Greeks, sandals were woven of similar plant materials, but the Greeks also varied the process by tying small pieces of wood together with dried grass. In later years, they made sandals with leather from the hides of animals. The first Greek shoes were purely functional, but over time most were dyed and decorated to make fashion statements. Women began to wear soft, enclosed leather shoes, and these grew increasingly fancy in the later years of the Greek civilization. The Romans wore sandals much like the Greeks did, but used more pieces of leather to make them. Some Roman sandals had straps that wrapped around the ankles. Shoemakers often dyed these sandals in bright colors that represented the different jobs held by the people wearing them. The patricians, or privileged classes, wore red sandals with moon-shaped ornaments on the back. Senators wore brown shoes with four black leather straps wound around the lower leg. Consuls, or legal officers, wore white shoes, and soldiers wore heavy leather sandals that were more like boots—but with bare toes! Meanwhile, people who lived in cold northern climates were making their shoes from the hides of furry animals, such as polar bears and yaks. The soles and tops of these shoes were made from pieces of soft leather sewn together. This type of shoe—whether or not it used fur—was called a moccasin. Some Native American groups made and wore moccasins for thousands of years. Some moccasins were plain, and others were adorned with beadwork. C Blank~30 As the centuries passed, the primary material for shoes continued to be leather, and the process of making shoes did not change quickly. A wood and metal framework called a "last" was wrapped with pieces of leather that were then sewn together. As late as the mid-1800s, lasts were straight on both sides; this meant that there was no difference in shape between left and right shoes. It also meant that shoes were uncomfortable and that breaking them in was not easy. The lasts were made in different sizes, but for a long time only two widths were available—thin and stout. For centuries, shoes were sewn by hand, just as they had been by the ancient Egyptians. Machines to assist shoemakers were not used until the rolling machine was invented in 1845. This device was used to pound pieces of leather into thin strips. About the same time, Elias Howe invented the sewing machine, and pieces of shoe leather could now be sewn together more quickly. Another inventor, Lyman Reed Blake, created a machine for sewing the soles of shoes to the upper parts. Because shoes could be made faster and more cheaply, people who had never owned shoes before could now afford to buy and wear them. D Blank~31 In Europe and North America during the seventeenth century, most people wore boots because they were practical. Even in many large cities, dirt roads were common, and people had to walk along muddy pathways and across streams. By the eighteenth century, however, more city streets were paved with cobblestones, and it was easier to keep shoes clean. Shoes became more decorative, and fancy buckles of gold and silver were often used. Most shoes worn in the United States throughout the nineteenth century were patterned after European styles. The major change in shoes over the last century has been the use of materials other than leather. Humphrey O'Sullivan invented the first rubber heel for shoes in 1898. Rubber heels were popular because they lasted much longer than heels made of leather. The use of rubber soles came next. The first rubbersoled shoes were called plimsolls, and they were manufactured in the United States in the late 1800s. The first American shoes made without leather were invented in 1917. The upper material was made of a flexible canvas. Those were the original "sneakers," a word that was used because the rubber sole made the shoe very quiet, unlike most leather shoes, which often squeaked when people walked. Many people today choose athletic shoes for casual wear, but not until the late 1970s were shoes designed with amateur athletes in mind. Shoes made of rubber and canvas were worn by tennis, volleyball, and basketball players. By the 1980s, companies began to design athletic shoes for specific sports, helping athletes perform better while protecting their feet and providing comfort. Shoes have come a long way since the ancient Egyptians created their first sandals. Many more types of materials are used, and shoes have never been more comfortable or supportive for feet. Even so, it is interesting that the basic sandal, crafted by people more than four thousand years ago, still has many similarities to shoes we wear today. |
History of Shoes
A Blank~28 Shoes—we wear them nearly every day. We walk, run, jump, climb, and stand in them for hours on end. Yet we hardly think about them because they are such an ordinary part of our daily lives. Shoes were not always an important part of people's wardrobes. The ancient Greeks, Egyptians, and Persians made and wore sandals, but actually went barefoot most of the time. These people lived in regions where the weather was temperate, and shoes were not needed to keep their feet warm. Archaeologists have found shoes in the ruins of these civilizations, but they seem to have been worn mainly by royalty, who could afford to employ tailors and shoemakers. B Blank~29 As shoes became more common in ancient Egypt, the first ones were simple sandals created mainly to protect the soles of the feet from rough surfaces. The easiest way to make shoes in these ancient times was to use materials that were readily available, including tree bark, leaves, and grasses. In ancient Egypt, sandals were made of rushes, which are grassy plants with hollow stalks. Rushes are the same plants used today to make chair bottoms, mats, and baskets. Among the ancient Greeks, sandals were woven of similar plant materials, but the Greeks also varied the process by tying small pieces of wood together with dried grass. In later years, they made sandals with leather from the hides of animals. The first Greek shoes were purely functional, but over time most were dyed and decorated to make fashion statements. Women began to wear soft, enclosed leather shoes, and these grew increasingly fancy in the later years of the Greek civilization. The Romans wore sandals much like the Greeks did, but used more pieces of leather to make them. Some Roman sandals had straps that wrapped around the ankles. Shoemakers often dyed these sandals in bright colors that represented the different jobs held by the people wearing them. The patricians, or privileged classes, wore red sandals with moon-shaped ornaments on the back. Senators wore brown shoes with four black leather straps wound around the lower leg. Consuls, or legal officers, wore white shoes, and soldiers wore heavy leather sandals that were more like boots—but with bare toes! Meanwhile, people who lived in cold northern climates were making their shoes from the hides of furry animals, such as polar bears and yaks. The soles and tops of these shoes were made from pieces of soft leather sewn together. This type of shoe—whether or not it used fur—was called a moccasin. Some Native American groups made and wore moccasins for thousands of years. Some moccasins were plain, and others were adorned with beadwork. C Blank~30 As the centuries passed, the primary material for shoes continued to be leather, and the process of making shoes did not change quickly. A wood and metal framework called a "last" was wrapped with pieces of leather that were then sewn together. As late as the mid-1800s, lasts were straight on both sides; this meant that there was no difference in shape between left and right shoes. It also meant that shoes were uncomfortable and that breaking them in was not easy. The lasts were made in different sizes, but for a long time only two widths were available—thin and stout. For centuries, shoes were sewn by hand, just as they had been by the ancient Egyptians. Machines to assist shoemakers were not used until the rolling machine was invented in 1845. This device was used to pound pieces of leather into thin strips. About the same time, Elias Howe invented the sewing machine, and pieces of shoe leather could now be sewn together more quickly. Another inventor, Lyman Reed Blake, created a machine for sewing the soles of shoes to the upper parts. Because shoes could be made faster and more cheaply, people who had never owned shoes before could now afford to buy and wear them. D Blank~31 In Europe and North America during the seventeenth century, most people wore boots because they were practical. Even in many large cities, dirt roads were common, and people had to walk along muddy pathways and across streams. By the eighteenth century, however, more city streets were paved with cobblestones, and it was easier to keep shoes clean. Shoes became more decorative, and fancy buckles of gold and silver were often used. Most shoes worn in the United States throughout the nineteenth century were patterned after European styles. The major change in shoes over the last century has been the use of materials other than leather. Humphrey O'Sullivan invented the first rubber heel for shoes in 1898. Rubber heels were popular because they lasted much longer than heels made of leather. The use of rubber soles came next. The first rubbersoled shoes were called plimsolls, and they were manufactured in the United States in the late 1800s. The first American shoes made without leather were invented in 1917. The upper material was made of a flexible canvas. Those were the original "sneakers," a word that was used because the rubber sole made the shoe very quiet, unlike most leather shoes, which often squeaked when people walked. Many people today choose athletic shoes for casual wear, but not until the late 1970s were shoes designed with amateur athletes in mind. Shoes made of rubber and canvas were worn by tennis, volleyball, and basketball players. By the 1980s, companies began to design athletic shoes for specific sports, helping athletes perform better while protecting their feet and providing comfort. Shoes have come a long way since the ancient Egyptians created their first sandals. Many more types of materials are used, and shoes have never been more comfortable or supportive for feet. Even so, it is interesting that the basic sandal, crafted by people more than four thousand years ago, still has many similarities to shoes we wear today. |
History of Shoes
A Blank~28 Shoes—we wear them nearly every day. We walk, run, jump, climb, and stand in them for hours on end. Yet we hardly think about them because they are such an ordinary part of our daily lives. Shoes were not always an important part of people's wardrobes. The ancient Greeks, Egyptians, and Persians made and wore sandals, but actually went barefoot most of the time. These people lived in regions where the weather was temperate, and shoes were not needed to keep their feet warm. Archaeologists have found shoes in the ruins of these civilizations, but they seem to have been worn mainly by royalty, who could afford to employ tailors and shoemakers. B Blank~29 As shoes became more common in ancient Egypt, the first ones were simple sandals created mainly to protect the soles of the feet from rough surfaces. The easiest way to make shoes in these ancient times was to use materials that were readily available, including tree bark, leaves, and grasses. In ancient Egypt, sandals were made of rushes, which are grassy plants with hollow stalks. Rushes are the same plants used today to make chair bottoms, mats, and baskets. Among the ancient Greeks, sandals were woven of similar plant materials, but the Greeks also varied the process by tying small pieces of wood together with dried grass. In later years, they made sandals with leather from the hides of animals. The first Greek shoes were purely functional, but over time most were dyed and decorated to make fashion statements. Women began to wear soft, enclosed leather shoes, and these grew increasingly fancy in the later years of the Greek civilization. The Romans wore sandals much like the Greeks did, but used more pieces of leather to make them. Some Roman sandals had straps that wrapped around the ankles. Shoemakers often dyed these sandals in bright colors that represented the different jobs held by the people wearing them. The patricians, or privileged classes, wore red sandals with moon-shaped ornaments on the back. Senators wore brown shoes with four black leather straps wound around the lower leg. Consuls, or legal officers, wore white shoes, and soldiers wore heavy leather sandals that were more like boots—but with bare toes! Meanwhile, people who lived in cold northern climates were making their shoes from the hides of furry animals, such as polar bears and yaks. The soles and tops of these shoes were made from pieces of soft leather sewn together. This type of shoe—whether or not it used fur—was called a moccasin. Some Native American groups made and wore moccasins for thousands of years. Some moccasins were plain, and others were adorned with beadwork. C Blank~30 As the centuries passed, the primary material for shoes continued to be leather, and the process of making shoes did not change quickly. A wood and metal framework called a "last" was wrapped with pieces of leather that were then sewn together. As late as the mid-1800s, lasts were straight on both sides; this meant that there was no difference in shape between left and right shoes. It also meant that shoes were uncomfortable and that breaking them in was not easy. The lasts were made in different sizes, but for a long time only two widths were available—thin and stout. For centuries, shoes were sewn by hand, just as they had been by the ancient Egyptians. Machines to assist shoemakers were not used until the rolling machine was invented in 1845. This device was used to pound pieces of leather into thin strips. About the same time, Elias Howe invented the sewing machine, and pieces of shoe leather could now be sewn together more quickly. Another inventor, Lyman Reed Blake, created a machine for sewing the soles of shoes to the upper parts. Because shoes could be made faster and more cheaply, people who had never owned shoes before could now afford to buy and wear them. D Blank~31 In Europe and North America during the seventeenth century, most people wore boots because they were practical. Even in many large cities, dirt roads were common, and people had to walk along muddy pathways and across streams. By the eighteenth century, however, more city streets were paved with cobblestones, and it was easier to keep shoes clean. Shoes became more decorative, and fancy buckles of gold and silver were often used. Most shoes worn in the United States throughout the nineteenth century were patterned after European styles. The major change in shoes over the last century has been the use of materials other than leather. Humphrey O'Sullivan invented the first rubber heel for shoes in 1898. Rubber heels were popular because they lasted much longer than heels made of leather. The use of rubber soles came next. The first rubbersoled shoes were called plimsolls, and they were manufactured in the United States in the late 1800s. The first American shoes made without leather were invented in 1917. The upper material was made of a flexible canvas. Those were the original "sneakers," a word that was used because the rubber sole made the shoe very quiet, unlike most leather shoes, which often squeaked when people walked. Many people today choose athletic shoes for casual wear, but not until the late 1970s were shoes designed with amateur athletes in mind. Shoes made of rubber and canvas were worn by tennis, volleyball, and basketball players. By the 1980s, companies began to design athletic shoes for specific sports, helping athletes perform better while protecting their feet and providing comfort. Shoes have come a long way since the ancient Egyptians created their first sandals. Many more types of materials are used, and shoes have never been more comfortable or supportive for feet. Even so, it is interesting that the basic sandal, crafted by people more than four thousand years ago, still has many similarities to shoes we wear today. |
History of Shoes
A Blank~28 Shoes—we wear them nearly every day. We walk, run, jump, climb, and stand in them for hours on end. Yet we hardly think about them because they are such an ordinary part of our daily lives. Shoes were not always an important part of people's wardrobes. The ancient Greeks, Egyptians, and Persians made and wore sandals, but actually went barefoot most of the time. These people lived in regions where the weather was temperate, and shoes were not needed to keep their feet warm. Archaeologists have found shoes in the ruins of these civilizations, but they seem to have been worn mainly by royalty, who could afford to employ tailors and shoemakers. B Blank~29 As shoes became more common in ancient Egypt, the first ones were simple sandals created mainly to protect the soles of the feet from rough surfaces. The easiest way to make shoes in these ancient times was to use materials that were readily available, including tree bark, leaves, and grasses. In ancient Egypt, sandals were made of rushes, which are grassy plants with hollow stalks. Rushes are the same plants used today to make chair bottoms, mats, and baskets. Among the ancient Greeks, sandals were woven of similar plant materials, but the Greeks also varied the process by tying small pieces of wood together with dried grass. In later years, they made sandals with leather from the hides of animals. The first Greek shoes were purely functional, but over time most were dyed and decorated to make fashion statements. Women began to wear soft, enclosed leather shoes, and these grew increasingly fancy in the later years of the Greek civilization. The Romans wore sandals much like the Greeks did, but used more pieces of leather to make them. Some Roman sandals had straps that wrapped around the ankles. Shoemakers often dyed these sandals in bright colors that represented the different jobs held by the people wearing them. The patricians, or privileged classes, wore red sandals with moon-shaped ornaments on the back. Senators wore brown shoes with four black leather straps wound around the lower leg. Consuls, or legal officers, wore white shoes, and soldiers wore heavy leather sandals that were more like boots—but with bare toes! Meanwhile, people who lived in cold northern climates were making their shoes from the hides of furry animals, such as polar bears and yaks. The soles and tops of these shoes were made from pieces of soft leather sewn together. This type of shoe—whether or not it used fur—was called a moccasin. Some Native American groups made and wore moccasins for thousands of years. Some moccasins were plain, and others were adorned with beadwork. C Blank~30 As the centuries passed, the primary material for shoes continued to be leather, and the process of making shoes did not change quickly. A wood and metal framework called a "last" was wrapped with pieces of leather that were then sewn together. As late as the mid-1800s, lasts were straight on both sides; this meant that there was no difference in shape between left and right shoes. It also meant that shoes were uncomfortable and that breaking them in was not easy. The lasts were made in different sizes, but for a long time only two widths were available—thin and stout. For centuries, shoes were sewn by hand, just as they had been by the ancient Egyptians. Machines to assist shoemakers were not used until the rolling machine was invented in 1845. This device was used to pound pieces of leather into thin strips. About the same time, Elias Howe invented the sewing machine, and pieces of shoe leather could now be sewn together more quickly. Another inventor, Lyman Reed Blake, created a machine for sewing the soles of shoes to the upper parts. Because shoes could be made faster and more cheaply, people who had never owned shoes before could now afford to buy and wear them. D Blank~31 In Europe and North America during the seventeenth century, most people wore boots because they were practical. Even in many large cities, dirt roads were common, and people had to walk along muddy pathways and across streams. By the eighteenth century, however, more city streets were paved with cobblestones, and it was easier to keep shoes clean. Shoes became more decorative, and fancy buckles of gold and silver were often used. Most shoes worn in the United States throughout the nineteenth century were patterned after European styles. The major change in shoes over the last century has been the use of materials other than leather. Humphrey O'Sullivan invented the first rubber heel for shoes in 1898. Rubber heels were popular because they lasted much longer than heels made of leather. The use of rubber soles came next. The first rubbersoled shoes were called plimsolls, and they were manufactured in the United States in the late 1800s. The first American shoes made without leather were invented in 1917. The upper material was made of a flexible canvas. Those were the original "sneakers," a word that was used because the rubber sole made the shoe very quiet, unlike most leather shoes, which often squeaked when people walked. Many people today choose athletic shoes for casual wear, but not until the late 1970s were shoes designed with amateur athletes in mind. Shoes made of rubber and canvas were worn by tennis, volleyball, and basketball players. By the 1980s, companies began to design athletic shoes for specific sports, helping athletes perform better while protecting their feet and providing comfort. Shoes have come a long way since the ancient Egyptians created their first sandals. Many more types of materials are used, and shoes have never been more comfortable or supportive for feet. Even so, it is interesting that the basic sandal, crafted by people more than four thousand years ago, still has many similarities to shoes we wear today. |